Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 6/23/01 11:04:27 AM Eastern Daylight Time, patriquen@yahoo.com writes: << The New York Times v. a photographer: http://www.cjr.org/year/01/3/photo.asp >> As a lawyer who has worked in the ethics and professionalism field for 30 + years, I read this duel of words (laden with both legal and psychic content) between a working free-lance photographer and a [doubtles] highly paid lawyer for the NY Times with enormous satisfaction. For those of you who might haved skipped it, I earnestly commend it to your attention. The result is the way great companies should respond, although it should not have taken the Times nearly so long to realize that what is <legal> is not always <right>. Seth LaK 9