Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Anthony I've just looked at the site. The first photograph I selected was 1072 x 366 and 127k, hardly a thumbnail. The second was 354 x 520 and 55k. Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mxsmanic Sent: 03 July 2001 06:46 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Watermarking WWW images (was "Anthony' photos) Andrew Nemeth writes: > Well maybe, that is until you start to create > and display work of commercial value, then your > attitude changes markedly! Maybe, but I doubt it. The examples I've seen were both the size of a matchbox _and_ visibly watermarked. Even without the watermark, it would have been impossible to use them for anything worthwhile, so why bother? And they were so small that even without the watermark they could hardly be distinguished, and with it the actual content of the photo was almost invisible. Personally, I'd never _buy_ an image that I could not see clearly to begin with. > For instance, images & sounds I have of the