Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35
From: "Bill Harting" <wharting@adelphia.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:23:08 -0400
References: <3B95D30B.7CE4E0DF@webshuttle.ch> <3.0.6.32.20010905085040.00a24da0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <3B965E86.F8829C4C@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
 
dan c. wrote: The implication of what you are saying is that some other
camera (such as
an SLR) could nat have taken this picture, that they don't have this
ability.   Why is this?  I don't mean to be overly argumentative, but I am
certain that if Nathan was sitting there with my Minolta SLR instead of his
M3, he could have captured the very same image.




Maybe it's because it is so easy to always have an M (or a IIIf) with you
ready to shoot...

Bill Harting
In reply to: Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> ([Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Nathan's picture of Week 35)