Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: double exposure
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 16:42:17 -0700
References: <200110031727.KAA17281@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3BBB7D44.E8E8D826@ldp.com> <3BBCC07F.A1A0A0F7@d2.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20011004142616.036db788@pop.alink.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20011004161442.036b9768@pop.alink.net>

Jim Brick wrote:
> 
> My suspicions are that if it is not spelled out in the users manual (like
> it is in R camera manuals) and if it makes a fingernail on blackboard
> noise, it is not "safe" to do.
> 
> I personally like the insides of my M cameras therefore I don't wish to
> force them to grind, growl, and squeal.
> 
> I abstain.

Sounds like a plan to me.

feli

- -- 
________________________________________________________________________

 "It's truly one of those shows where you just keep expecting Allen Funt
 to come bursting out from behind some 2-way mirror and explain that
 you've been on candid camera for 3 years."
                       -Ethan Ormsby on the status of production, 1999
________________________________________________________________________
        Feli di Giorgio * Compositing Supervisor * DIGITAL DOMAIN
       			      feli@d2.com * Ext. 3074
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com> ([Leica] double exposure)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: double exposure)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Re: double exposure)