Re: [Leica] the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt

["Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com>]

George Weir wrote:

>>> If there is no difference in results as you say then why would it be
> that clients, photographers and non-photographers can correctly identify
> the "better photos" when shown a set taken under same circumstances,
> using same film, developer, paper etc.?<<<<

Hi George,
There maybe a discrepancy in the wording: >>photographers and
non-photographers can correctly identify  the "better photos" <<<<<<

I wondered if you meant >>> " crisper, sharper, contrasty etc etc" as all
being positive adjectives in complimenting the image, as opposed to:
 >>the "better photos"<<< which implies a better photo as in content.

Am I correct in this assumption?

ted



Ted Grant Photography Limited
www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "George Weir" <george@georgeweir.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 7:54 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] the 90% rule-long, rambling BS from Walt


> Ok Walt I'll bite, and no flame intended;
>
>
> and I'll also beg to differ;
> > Even Erwin states (if somewhat cryptically) that the ONLY way to
> > see the superiority of this glass is to use a tripod,
> My tripod has not been out of the trunk for at least six months and yet
> I somehow still see the superiority of the glass.
>
> BTW who's Erwin? Elliot?
>
> Also I'm interested as to what are considered examples of
> > 'real world' films
>
> PS wanna buy some "acceptable"  nikkors?
> They just don't take the same photographs!
>
>
> All good things to you and yours
>
> George
>
> George Weir Photography
> www.georgeweir.com
> Phone    717-581-0389
> Toll-free  877-934-7368
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html