Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I was not defending you, Nathan. But I was defending the way you photographed. Ted's comments are right. Sometimes, not always. I knew your tilting was not intentional but I think that, in this specific case, adds some vibrant stuff and rhythm. No tilting in your photo would lead us to some boring image taken bye whoever pro photographer in a specific assignment for design magazine or so. By the way, have you ever seen any difference between two pros of the same photo ? As a pro photographer I am I try not to keep rules so hard. This allows me to work free to let the viewer feels in there. Perspective is great most of the times. Human eye works great that way. When using LF cameras I try to get some specific angle of view rather to compensate for verticals, even to play with focusing not to have everything in 100% focused. But that's my way to work. Some people think a photo should show everything. I think that a photo is only to suggest, to let the viewer go through his own trip. Regards - -- Pablo Kolodny www.pablokolodny.com > From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2001 08:45:03 +0100 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Nathan's PAW 48 - what a real bookshop looks like > > Pablo, > > Thanks for the kind comments and for defending me...But I must confess that I > agree with Ted's comments in general and the tilt in my shots was not > intentional, it was simply the result of shooting fast while talking to the > owner. > > Nathan - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html