Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Spill it, Colin. The Canon 1.0 is a clam? Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Colin > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 7:09 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon > > > I'm biting my tongue. Ow. Please don't ask that anymore :D > > Regards, > Colin > http://www.availabledark.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of > > Marc James Small > > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:37 PM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon > > > > > > At 03:55 PM 12/11/01 -0600, Jeffery L.Smith wrote: > > >I have heard nothing but mediocre reviews of the 0.95 Canon > > lens. For > > >fast lenses, the ranking is always: > > > > > >Noctilux 1.0 best > > >Canon 50/1.2 okay > > >Canon 50/.95 avoid > > > > > > > What about the Canon EF 50mm f/1 lens? > > > > Marc > > > > msmall@roanoke.infi.net FAX: +540/343-7315 > > Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir! > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-> users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html