Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]What is "the entitlement of heightened protection"? Who has entitled what? - ---------- >From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? >Date: Sat, Dec 22, 2001, 1:11 AM > > No, of course not. But I think the definition of what is the press and > the entitlement of heightened protection is pertinent here. > > Slboodan Dimitrov > > "John M. Sikes, Jr." wrote: >> >> Libel has nothing to do with it. >> >> ---------- >> >From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> >> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >> >Subject: Re: [Leica] when is a pj not a pj? >> >Date: Sat, Dec 22, 2001, 12:06 AM >> > >> >> > You might want to read this little trifle; >> > http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0%2C1283%2C48996%2C00.html >> > Speaks volumes. >> > Slobodan Dimitrov >> > >> > "John M. Sikes, Jr." wrote: >> >> >> >> "Photo journalists" is an approbation given by the trade to itself. There >> >> is no civil or criminal statute or principle of law which exempts self >> >> styled PJ's from the consequences of their actions. >> >> When two persons act in knowing concert, as to outsiders they are equally >> >> responsible, as principal and agent in civil law and as co- conspirators in >> >> criminal law, regardless what names they give themselves. >> >> º >> > -- >> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html