Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Bill 602P - E-Mail Surcharge
From: "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 17:57:49 -0600
References: <0.1300001572.2098350927-1463792126-1009461982@topica.com> <MABBJJLPMBEAOLKHGGIAKEBIDAAA.jsmith45@bellsouth.net> <km9n2u4et4s34hpp01501uo4nqdj2gre0d@4ax.com>

Thanks, Eric, I agree.  If you want to get the scoop on most of this stuff,
go to
http://www.snopes2.com/

If you forget where it is, there is a link on my web page for it.

Sonny
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 5:05 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Bill 602P - E-Mail Surcharge


> One thing that can help stop the waste of forwarding "chicken little"
> announcements is to check the veracity yourself before passing it on.
Both
> the US House and Senate have web sites where you can find the full text of
> various bills before committees.  Here's a sure tip that this is a
> hoax...602P is an invalid bill number.  Doesn't exist.  Never has, never
> will.  Besides, checking stuff out for yourself first may save some future
> embarrassment.  :)
>
>
> Eric
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> ([Leica] RE: Bill 602P - E-Mail Surcharge)
Message from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: Bill 602P - E-Mail Surcharge)