Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]i like both of these images as explorations of form and tonality. but i must say the scans--particularly that of the main image-- are uncharacteristically grainy, particularly for tri-X and xtol. do your prints look like this? - -rei > From: Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> > > > I have my 2nd week photo up at: > > <http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2002PAW/large-images/paw2c-large.jpg> > > The alternate is available at: > > <http://www.splitsecondfilms.com/2002PAW/large-images/paw2d-large.jpg> > > Here in the central valley we get lots of fog and rain - very low-contrast. So i > was experimenting with trying to use that to some advantage in making these > images. > > Shot with Tri-X at 200 in Xtol 1:1. The main photo was with a 90mm (the old tiny > one) while the alternate was with the Summicron 50mm. > > Adam Bridge > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- Rei Shinozuka shino@ubspainewebber.com 212-713-6256 FAX: 212-713-1482 UBS Warburg Fixed Income Quantitative Research, UBS Warburg LLC 1285 Avenue of the Americas, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10019-6028 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "The X Consortium requests that the following names be used when referring to this software: X, X Window System, X Version 11, X Window System, Version 11, X11." (NOT "X-WINDOWS"!!!) -X man page (parenthetical exegesis mine) - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html