Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Is it me or ....
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 09:37:37 -0700
References: <MABBJJLPMBEAOLKHGGIAKECJDEAA.jsmith45@bellsouth.net>

Hi Jeffery,

Yes I've already done that.

The problem is I want to look at the newly posted PAW's but skip past 
most of the massive number of comments regarding previously posted PAW 
notices. Your solution is not a solution because I still have to wade 
through a massive amount of chaff to see the wheat.

Regards,

Greg

Jeffery Smith wrote:

>Eudora will allow you to make a filter that will put everything with PAW in
>the subject line into a separate folder. That's what I'm doing now.
>
>Jeffery Smith
>New Orleans, LA
>
>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Brian Reid
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 9:32 PM
>>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Is it me or ....
>>
>>
>>
>>>I'm still waiting for Brian's decision before I decide whether to
>>>continue to subscribe to this list or bail out.
>>>
>>Me too.
>>I'm going to pull together some technology to focus and
>>consolidate the PAW
>>announcements and comments, which should make everything easier for
>>everyone. Its use will be totally voluntary. I expect that, given my day
>>job, it will take me about a month to get this working.
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Eric" <ericm@pobox.com> ([Leica] Re: Is it me or ....)
Reply from "geebeespaw" <geebeespaw@btopenworld.com> (Re: [Leica] Is it me or ....)
In reply to: Message from "Jeffery Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> (RE: [Leica] Is it me or ....)