Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Teeny, tiny, parts, incredible precision, all hand assembly, precious metals, and, most important, because there are people who will pay for a watch what others pay for a year of Harvard, even though the watch will not tell time as well as a $15 digital (sure looks nicer and lasts longer though - as long as you don't ever bang your wrist against that Bimmer/Beemer door). :-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jim Brick Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 12:41 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: [Leica] Re: Patek vs Leica At 09:12 AM 2/15/2002 -0800, Mike Gil wrote: >Great joke Henry. But it should be a "Rolex". >Somebody with BMW could not afford a Patek. > >mike So what is it that makes a "Patek" more expensive than Leicas, or BMWs for that matter...? Jim - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html