Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dans un courrier daté du 16/02/02 08:17:02 Paris, Madrid, henryting10@yahoo.com a écrit : > That was my rationale, but now after having bought the > new version, I'm not too sure. > > --- Sam Carleton <scarleton@miltonstreet.com> wrote: > > One would think that if you just spent money to buy > > the ASPH, you would > > unload the older lens. > > > > Henry Ting wrote: > > > > > > I just got the new 35 ASPH, now together with the > > pre > > > ASPH version, I have 2 35 crons, and I have a hard > > > time deciding which to keep. > > > The pre-version is smaller and lighter (150 gm) > > and > > > the ASPH version is bigger and weighs (250 gm). To > > me, > > > the ASPH version is slighter better in pictorial > > > quality, but not by much when I examine prints in > > > 8x10. The newest and the greatest is tempting, but > > my > > > pre-asph version is no slough and being the > > smallest, > > > lightest lens, its a perfect match to the Leica M. > > > What do you guys think ? I only want to keep one. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, see > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > I'd keep the Asph for sure . I've had the STD version , but the asph is mucho better at F2. Loose 150 grams on your body and walk with the Asph ! :) Jo Goodtimes , France - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html