Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Henry, Like Ted, I found the survey very interesting. Now I want to try some of the films listed that I have never used before. Regards, Greg Ted Bayer wrote: >I agree. Thank you, Henry. > >Ted in Olalla > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 7:30 AM >Subject: Film Survey, was Re: [Leica] A Warning To The LUG Regarding >Off-list Communication with Our Friend Sam Carlton. > > >>Henry, I, and probably many of the rest of the group, appreciate the >> >film > >>survey. I think you can attribute the lack of response to the fact >> >that > >>results like this are hard to argue with! The discussions on why >> >people > >>liked various films, some of which you included, were especially >> >valuable. > >>Thanks. >> >>Mike D >> >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Henry Ting" <henryting10@yahoo.com> >>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >>Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 1:44 AM >>Subject: Re: [Leica] A Warning To The LUG Regarding Off-list >> >Communication > >>with Our Friend Sam Carlton. >> >> >>>I'm the one who orginally posted the BMW/Patek/Leica >>>joke. At the time, I thought it was plain funny. What >>>was meant to be a joke could result in endless verbal >>>slings between some of the folks here is just plain >>>silly. I also, posted a film survey with input from a >>>lot of people here, and yet no mention or discussion >>>followups on the topic whatsover. Which leads me to >>>question the value of this plateform. >>> >>>--- Roland Smith <roland@dnai.com> wrote: >>> >>>>Thanks for the caution advice. >>>> >>>>The interplay was interesting, since, I wasn't >>>>paying attention until it >>>>escalated to the attack stage. I didn't realize it >>>>had originated from the >>>>BMW joke which I have told numerous times to >>>>illustrate the human nature, >>>>albeit widely displayed, to focus on the less >>>>important when the vital issue >>>>is totally missed. Alas, I find myself there >>>>frequently. >>>> >>>>Roland Smith >>>>Oakland, California >>>> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> >>>>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >>>>Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 7:14 PM >>>>Subject: [Leica] A Warning To The LUG Regarding >>>>Off-list Communication with >>>>Our Friend Sam Carlton. >>>> >>>> >>>>>-Sam Carleton Posted the following >>>>> >>>>>"Sorry folks, this email was suppose to go about >>>>> >>>>about eight hours ago: >>>> >>>>>kyle cassidy wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>on this list when someone criticizes you i've >>>>>> >>>>found you can never win by >>>> >>>>>>attacking back. a "haha thanks" goes a long way, >>>>>> >>>>or an email off list. >>>> >>>>>>especially until you know them and they get to >>>>>> >>>>know you. >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"B. D. Colen" wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I understand your getting ticked off, but the >>>>>> >>>>problem is that the >>>> >>>>>>Bimmer/Beemer thread had really deteriorated to >>>>>> >>>>one of these >>>> >>>>>look-what-I've >>>>> >>>>>>got things - as, sadly, often seems to happen on >>>>>> >>>>the LUG - before Jim >>>> >>>>>>weighed in. >>>>>> >>>>>>Anyway, I hope we can bury whatever hatchets >>>>>> >>>>we're wielding." >>>> >>>>>----- >>>>>I would like to point out to the list that the >>>>> >>>>quote from me is taken from >>>> >>>>>an off-list communication sent to Sam Carlton, and >>>>> >>>>was not intended for >>>> >>>>>posting on the list. And I consider his having >>>>> >>>>quoted an off-list >>>> >>>>>communication in that way a pretty egregious >>>>> >>>>violation of basic >>>>netiquette, >>>> >>>>>to say nothing of its simply being extremely rude. >>>>> >>>>>Anyone sending him off-list communications should >>>>> >>>>be forewarned that what >>>> >>>>>you think is off-list may not be for long. >>>>> >>>>>B. D. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>B. D. >>>>> >>>>>I just want to clear the air. At no time was I >>>>> >>>>ever ticked off, I was >>>> >>>>>simply having some fun with folks. At no time did >>>>> >>>>I ever hvae a hatchet >>>> >>>>>which neede to be bury:) >>>>> >>>>>And for those of you that think this was a big >>>>> >>>>waste of time, it >>>> >>>>>wasn't. For one thing I learned a great deal >>>>> >>>>about others in the LUG >>>> >>>>>thanks to many people enlighten me to who they >>>>> >>>>really are and what they >>>> >>>>>have done. My respect for a number of LUG members >>>>> >>>>has most definitly >>>> >>>>>improved. >>>>> >>>>>This thread, which I think is finally run it >>>>> >>>>cource, has helped me >>>> >>>>>understand the LUG and what makes it tick. Again, >>>>> >>>>thanks! >>>> >>>>>Sam Carleton >>>>>-- >>>>>To unsubscribe, see >>>>> >>>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>To unsubscribe, see >>>>> >>>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>-- >>>>To unsubscribe, see >>>> >>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>> >>> >>>__________________________________________________ >>>Do You Yahoo!? >>>Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games >>>http://sports.yahoo.com >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, see >>> >http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see >> >http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html