Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: [Leica] Erwin Puts' M7 report
From: "Jem Kime" <jem.kime@cwcom.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 20:55:33 -0000
References: <3C6433EF0000CD9F@mail.san.yahoo.com>

I tried this and found no difference but  you may find different.
Jem
- ----- Original Message -----
From: <ned@kajabbi.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 11:31 AM
Subject: [Leica] RE: [Leica] Erwin Puts' M7 report


> If you are having a continual problem with viewfinder glare, there is a
> gentleman in Switzerland that has the answer. A simple filter that fit
over
> the viewfinder window. It works wonders yet does not darken the finder in
> very low light. H makes two other very useful items for your Ms. All worth
> buying!! You can find him on E-bay.
> Kajabbi
>
> -- Original Message --
>
> >
> >> > 2. IF the M7 coating was changed to reduce reflection, then Leica has
> >> > finally tacitly acknowledged that the M6 was/is DEFECTIVE. So
> >> the question
> >> > then is - aren't we all entitled to have the M7 fix applied to
> >> our M6s at no
> >> > charge?
> >>
> >> Gee - if an automobile manufacturer puts on anti-lock breaks
> >> which work better
> >> does that make previous car defective?
> >>
> >> I don't think so.
> >
> >"Work better" is entirely different than not work reliably.  The M6
> >viewfinder does have a problem, that does not exist in older incarnations
> >of
> >Leica M cameras.
> >
> >> Sheesh - give me a break.
> >
> >Yuk Yuk...would that be an anti-lock break ;-)
> >
> >Austin
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from ned@kajabbi.com ([Leica] RE: [Leica] Erwin Puts' M7 report)