Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 09:57:29 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020304211317.02a93600@infoave.net>

At 07:41 PM 3/4/02 -0800, you wrote:
> > . . .you will appreciate the little extra distance of the 100  macro.  I
>use the 60 a lot for making copy > photos.  You can go wrong with either.
> >
> > Tina
>
>Tina, I have to admit to having also gone wrong with my Leica lenses a time
>or two as well. I don't have the 60 or the 100, but have definitely taken
>some bad shots with BOTH the 90 Elmarit and 90 Tele-Elmarit. I once even
>wasted most of a roll with the 135 Elmarit, forgetting to take off the lens
>cap.  Yes, one can even go wrong with Leica lenses, and I for one am happy
>to here that is not my plight alone. Sigh . .  but confession is good for
>the soul, yes?
>
>Gary Todoroff
>Tree LUGger


And one can also go wrong with proofreading e-mail!!

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com
images available from http://www.pdiphotos.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro)