Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 16:48:49 -0700
References: <B8AE25B7.1ADFA%jbcollier@powersurfr.com>

John,

Better to be going through the desert on a horse with no name then 
through the desert with no horse to blame.

That song always bugged me too.

Why Photo Phreak and not Foto Freak? Or that Freaking Photo Phreak?

Regards,

Greg

John Collier wrote:

>It was bad enough going through the desert on a horse with no name. I am not
>going to have conversations with someone called Photo Phreak!
>
>Seriously though, we all use our real names here and I appreciate it. We are
>not fourteen year olds taking a break from cruising porn sites. It is not
>all about cameras; people, personalities and names are important.
>
>John Collier
>
>>From: SthRosner@aol.com
>>
>>please let the phreakperson be. I've had an off-list communication with
>>her/him and there is very sound reason for the lack of ID. Honest.
>>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@powersurfr.com> ([Leica] Should the nameless stay nameless)