Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity
From: Jeffery Smith <jsmith45@bellsouth.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:21:02 -0500
References: <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA258183D1B@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu> <ECC6F7B330A26C40B652962C47DEA258183D1B@ASC02.asc.upenn.edu>
 
Non-gratuitous nudity is rarely very easy on the eyes.

JLS


At 02:20 PM 4/16/02, you wrote:
>Kyle:
>
> >http://www.netaxs.com/~cassidy/col.html
>
>Good use of colors.  Nice effect.  Seems like gratuitous nudity.  Not that
>there's anything wrong with that, though.  :)
>
>I think I'd like it better without the street and car in the background.  At
>the end of an alley where there's just a brick wall back behind.  I like the
>green color on the ground.
>
>
>Eric
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies: Reply from "Matthew Powell" <mlpowell@directvinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
 In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)
Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> ([Leica] no tats, no piercing, just plain old nudity)