Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: Vs: [Leica] Digital vs Film
From: David Rodgers <davrod@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:13:58 -0700
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020430081744.00a65340@swiftnet.com>

At 11:58 AM 4/30/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>I KNOW that you can't possibly be suggesting that the media used to capture
>images formed by light passing through a lens accounts for your M images
>being "more emotional." ;-)
>
>B. D.

B.D.

No, but for some reason knowing there's work to do after the shot makes me 
think more while taking the shot. I can be very lax if I don't feel I have 
too much into it. I haven't figured out if that's human nature or unique to 
me.

The deep fingernail marks in the ostrich skin of  my Titanium Leica M show 
how much I have invested in that! (OK, vulcanite and M6 Classic). I have a 
freezer full of Panotomic X and the formula for Microdol. I'm short term 
short and long term long on film futures.

Dave


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from David Rodgers <davrod@worldnet.att.net> (RE: Vs: [Leica] Digital vs Film)