Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/04/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] SF 20 vs. Metz 32-Z2 with SCA 3502
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:48:59 -0400
References: <MBBBJHIBKCKEAEOKKBPOMEEODIAA.bdcolen@earthlink.net>

- --On Tuesday, April 30, 2002 02:13:30 PM -0400 "B. D. Colen" 
<bdcolen@earthlink.net> wrote:

> DAMN!!! The Metz version bounces while on the shoe? Leave it to
> Leica...:-(...I can, of course, do anything with the SC17 cord, but with a
> swivel head it would be possible to use the damn thing to bounce while on
> A mounted on a plain vanilla M6.....And I'll be the Metz badged unit was
> the same price or cheaper than the one with the damn red dot....

Apples and oranges really.

I have both a Metz 32MZ-3 with an SCA3502 and an SF20. They are both very 
usable but, at least for me, in very different situations. First, and most 
obviously, the Metz is MUCH larger and heavier than the SF20. It is too 
large for the M6, IMHO, and I use it mainly on the R8 for which it is a 
better match. When used on an M, it unbalances the camera to a degree that 
it really defeats all the handling poise that is the strength of the M6 
(or, I guess M7).

From a lighting standpoint, I would use the Metz if I were trying to light 
up a whole space by bouncing off a ceiling or wall. I would use the SF20 
with off-camera cord to just punch a little light into a basically 
available-light situation.

- --
Rolfe Tessem
rolfe@ldp.com
Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] SF 20 vs. Metz 32-Z2 with SCA 3502)