Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]andy@tcinternet.net (Andrew Amundsen)5/11/023:43 PM > What's the consensus right now LUGers? I'd call it a photo-montage. And I'd expect that (or similar term) included in an editorial caption if the image had significant publication or distribution. However, I can guarantee that we see a lot of photographic images in publication which do not receive such identification and should. Likewise for retouched-photos. The days of "knowing" whether images in publications, on the web, in video, or film relate to "reality" have disappeared (no pun intended). Those interested in the integrity of their images and reputation probably need to state authenticity in their credits. i.e. "Unretouched, unmontaged photograph © 2002 John Doe". George - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html