Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/05/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LTM vs. M
From: "Mike Durling" <durling@widomaker.com>
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 22:43:09 -0400
References: <20263503123145@mirage.tcinternet.net>

Andrew,

I think you have defined exactly why many of us use those old cameras.  Of
course they don't always make us more creative, but the process of using
them is a lot of fun and very satisfying.

Looks like you have made your own mind up!

Mike D

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Amundsen" <andy@tcinternet.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LTM vs. M


> I should clarify that I want to purchase a second leica, but only have
> around $500-600 to spend. Part of the allure of the LTM camera is a sort
> of 'time travel'. Using a peice of equipment from the past to invigorate
> my thinking, approach and vision. The slower use of seperate VF/RF isn't
> a concern. I like the idea of slowing down with such a small precision
> instrument. I would use the LTM mainly for personal work and to carry
> like you would a wallet, always in your pocket. Thanks for all the
> suggestions/advice. I'll be looking forward to more...
> Andrew
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Andrew Amundsen" <andy@tcinternet.net> (Re: [Leica] LTM vs. M)