Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 mm RF lens test result
From: "Rob Appleby" <rob@robertappleby.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 00:16:05 +0200
References: <B9818CCA.11C8C%Mail@SlideOne.com>

I suspicion he mean the new one...
R.
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Straus" <Mail@SlideOne.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 11:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 mm RF lens test result


> on 8/15/02 3:47 PM, Christer Almqvist at chris@almqvist.net wrote:
> 
> > Second was Konica Hexanon with Zeiss Planar a close third, partly due
> > to a good price/quality relation where they only lost five and four
> > points respectively. Summilux was fourth, with eleven points lost due
> > to its high price. Disregarding the price/quality rating, Summicron
> > would still be placed before Summilux which would then be second
> > overall.
> 
> Sounds surprising. For how often I hear the Lux get complained about for
> it's old design etc it would still take 2nd for quality...? Odd...
> -- 
> John Straus
> Chicago, IL 
> http://SlideOne.com
> http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom
> ========================== 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Straus <Mail@SlideOne.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 mm RF lens test result)