Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] attention Singnet.com.sg subscribers
From: D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 15:13:22 +0800
References: <000001c24668$0d8eca40$825abada@dustpuppy> <000001c24668$0d8eca40$825abada@dustpuppy>

The best thing to do may be to change to pacific.net.

Dan K.

At 10:16 PM 8/17/02 -0700, you wrote:

>>Hi
>>
>>Hey! Wat did I do?
>>
>>Uhmmm.....i haven't been posting THAT much - I think only a total of 2,
>>so does this mass mailing happen only if I post something to this list?
>>
>>Red Dawn
>
>The Singapore duplicate messages can happen even when the person causing 
>it has never posted anything.
>
>If I knew just what was going on, I would tell you. If I knew who was 
>doing it, I would tell you. Singtel won't tell me. There is some command, 
>some action, some process or filter, that an Exchange user can ask for, 
>which results in all of the messages that the person has received being 
>re-transmitted as if for the first time. I don't know if the command being 
>issued is "move", "delete", "copy to folder", or "retransmit all to 
>original recipient". But the net effect is that messages in soneone's 
>inbox in Singapore are all being re-transmitted to the same address to 
>which they were originally sent.
>
>The duplicates are not reaching the LUG because I have software in place 
>to notice this and filter them out. But the LUG computer is being burdened 
>by having to filter such a large number of messages.
>
>If you get duplicates of messages, you need to look at the headers to see 
>where they differ. The haders of a message look like this. The key to look 
>at is the ESMTP id of your own mail host. If that ID is the same, then the 
>duplication is probably happening inside your ISP or inside your computer. 
>If it is different, then the duplication is happeing upstream. If you 
>study the headers carefully you can always see where the duplication is 
>taking place by looking at where the headers differ between the two 
>duplicated copies.
>
>Received: from mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [192.147.236.1])
>        by riverside.haddockseyes.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id 
> g7I3GEq31013; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: (from daemon@localhost)
>         by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) id UAA19541; Sat, 17 Aug 
> 2002 20:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net 
>[207.217.120.62])
>         by mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA19528; 
> Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
>Received: from dialup-63.208.63.2dial1.saintlouis1.level3.net 
>([63.208.63.2] helo=earthlink.net)
>         by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
>         id 17gGVu-0002tK-00
>         for leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us; Sat, 17 Aug 2002 20:14:02 
> -0700
>Message-ID: <3D5F0F90.AA82A412@earthlink.net>
>Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2002 22:08:01 -0500
>From: Michael Gerard <geeman1066@earthlink.net>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html







   

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Red Dawn" <reddawn@singnet.com.sg> (RE: [Leica] attention Singnet.com.sg subscribers)
Message from "Red Dawn" <reddawn@singnet.com.sg> (RE: [Leica] attention Singnet.com.sg subscribers)