Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Small pocketable camera
From: D Khong <dkhong@pacific.net.sg>
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 22:31:30 +0800
References: <F253250PWNb1crz3fvh00018a6f@hotmail.com>

If money is not of concern, I'd use the Contax T3. For lower budget, the 
Olympus stylus (non-zoom) with double aspherical 35/2.8 lens is a most 
underrated camera.

Dan K.

At 08:22 AM 8/29/02 -0500, you wrote:
>The Contax T3 is the flagship in my opinion. I load it with Superia 400 
>and P and S it. Never tried B&W. Fool proof and spouse can use it.
>
>Logan Reinwood wrote:
>
>>
>>HI,
>>
>>However a M is not a big camera, it migth be too big sometimes to carry 
>>along. I have a lomo that I take sometimes in my pocket. But it is more 
>>fun than really good, the lens is not good at least not good for making 
>>big prints, etc.
>>
>>I am thinking to buy something else, and I am considering a Rollei 35.
>>The only drawback I see with the rollei is the manual guessing 
>>focsussing. Is that a problem?
>>I was also considering a minilux, but it is almost as big as an M.
>>
>>What do lugger use as a smalller camera when a M is too big?
>>
>>any comment?
>>
>>TIA, logan
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________
>>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. 
>>http://www.hotmail.com
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html







   

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Logan Reinwood" <reinwood007@hotmail.com> ([Leica] Small pocketable camera)