Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The Olympus Stylus is also dirt cheap. I got mine at Service Merchandise a few years ago for <$100. At 10:31 PM 8/29/02 +0800, you wrote: >If money is not of concern, I'd use the Contax T3. For lower budget, the >Olympus stylus (non-zoom) with double aspherical 35/2.8 lens is a most >underrated camera. > >Dan K. > >At 08:22 AM 8/29/02 -0500, you wrote: >>The Contax T3 is the flagship in my opinion. I load it with Superia 400 >>and P and S it. Never tried B&W. Fool proof and spouse can use it. >> >>Logan Reinwood wrote: >> >>> >>>HI, >>> >>>However a M is not a big camera, it migth be too big sometimes to carry >>>along. I have a lomo that I take sometimes in my pocket. But it is more >>>fun than really good, the lens is not good at least not good for making >>>big prints, etc. >>> >>>I am thinking to buy something else, and I am considering a Rollei 35. >>>The only drawback I see with the rollei is the manual guessing >>>focsussing. Is that a problem? >>>I was also considering a minilux, but it is almost as big as an M. >>> >>>What do lugger use as a smalller camera when a M is too big? >>> >>>any comment? >>> >>>TIA, logan >>> >>> >>>_________________________________________________________________ >>>Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. >>>http://www.hotmail.com >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >> >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > > > > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html