Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/09/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] the latest madness -
From: Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net>
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 21:27:03 -0400
References: <DAEOKOEHIBMMGOJNOFECGEJJDLAA.phong@metrowerks.com> <001901c252c5$768b22a0$6501a8c0@sphillips> <012d01c252c8$7d52a420$b22eaaac@sonc>

At 07:05 PM 9/2/02 -0400, you wrote:
>If this list really were some kind of normal sample, wouldn't
>we expect more women? How many women are there in that 1000? 400? :-)
>
>stuart phillips

Stuart -

Considering the percentage of women who are photographers and then the 
percentage of that who are Leica users, the list is pretty representative.

Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
http://www.tinamanley.com

images available from:
http://www.pdiphotos.com
http://www.mira.com
http://www.agpix.com
http://www.newscom.com




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Phong" <phong@metrowerks.com> (RE: [Leica] the latest madness -)
Message from "Stuart Phillips" <stuart.phillips@rcn.com> (Re: [Leica] the latest madness -)
Message from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] the latest madness -)