Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Tri-X/Xtol problems - an FYI
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 18:26:16 +0200 (MEST)

Mark,
I use Neopan 400 in medium format. I've wondered about 35mm ... you seem
to be pleased. What made you choose it? Is it easy to push? (Or do you
skip that part and use Neopan 1600 instead).

Daniel

On Sat, 12 Oct 2002, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> Mike Durling wrote:
> >
> > Is this the NEW Tri-X?  The one with the improved anti-static
> > performance and slightly different developing times?
> >
> > I don't even know if this is out yet.
> >
> > Mike D
> >
> I think they've got a forth green stain layer they're not telling
> anybody about.
> Quatro X!
>
> In the meantime may I suggest Neopan 400? I'll vouce for it it's what
> I'm using.
>
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.markrabiner.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Tri-X/Xtol problems - an FYI)