Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT Neopan 1600 developers
From: John Straus <Mail@SlideOne.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:00:41 -0600

on 11/6/02 1:58 PM, Mark Rabiner at mark@markrabiner.com wrote:

> Not trying to be contentious, Rei, but i thought i knew my A&T backwards
> and forward could you give me a page number on that Neopan being a
> modified 400 ASA film and really being 640-800? This destroys my world!
> 
> A lot of people i know are shooting it at 1600 and got having any
> problems with thin shadows at all!
> 
> 
> Mark Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.markrabiner.com

Any chance of you posting a few current examples Rab? I also wonder if
scanning is a lot more harsh on the negs than B&W printing (as you do a lot
of darkroom work). My scans at 1600 suck especially with the Nikon LED...

- -- 
John Straus
Chicago, IL 
http://SlideOne.com
http://SlideOne.com/EditorsRoom
========================== 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] OT Neopan 1600 developers)