Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens
From: "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 21:26:19 +0100
References: <001c01c28f3d$eecacb80$0316fea9@ccasony01>

Oh! B.D. ... Not a very good humor sense there.
Ok. I am talking about my preferences. I don´t like pictures from 200 or
400mm lenses for general purpose (not wild, sports or so). They seem to me
flat.
Just my preferences.
You can do what you want.

Rafael

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:06 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens


> Are we disusing your back, or what makes more sense photographically?
> How did we get from the question of whether a 135 belongs on an M, to
> having to carry four cameras around?;-)
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Rafael
> Alday
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:58 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens
>
>
> I completely disagree with those who think that 90 or 135mm are for SLR.
> I don't use lenses longer than 135. So, in an small bag, I carry 2
> bodies (B&W and Color) and 21, 35, 50, 90 (and  I hope a 135mm in the
> future). Yes, I could carry 4 bodies... 2 RF (B&W and color films) with
> 21, 35 and 50 lenses and 2 SLR (B&W and color films) with 90,135,200 and
> 400 lenses. Sorry but my back does not permit that, Rafael
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:29 PM
> Subject: RE: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens
>
>
> > > when I shoot with a
> > > longer lens, I want the view through the lens. In fact, I prefer the
>
> > > reflex for pretty much anything over 50mm, and see the Leica 90s as
> > > fall backs for when I need near silence when shooting.
> > >
> > > But I am well aware that mine very much a minority opinion - on this
>
> > > list ;-)
> >
> > Nope. I'm exactly the same way. I have a 90mm Summicron that stays
> > home _all_ the time. I walked by a shop and saw a nice Tele-Elmarit
> > and considered picking it up, but realized I use the nice Nikkor
> > 85/2.0 when I need that kind of thing anyway ... so I bought the M2
> > instead. I hate changing lenses so now with a M4 and M2 (the M3 is
> > just too much of a pain to use since it got "fixed", so it is retired)
>
> > 35 and 50, I'm happy ... with the F3 for 85/135/200 ... and for those
> > moments I need god's gift to photographers (AE) ... quite often,
> > actually.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________
> Copa del Mundo de la FIFA 2002
> El único lugar de Internet con vídeos de los 64 partidos.
> ¡Apúntante ya! en http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/es/
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

_______________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger
Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis! 
Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens)
In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens)