Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Rafey, are you suggesting something that is biologically impossible? Rafael Alday wrote: >Oh! B.D. ... Not a very good humor sense there. >Ok. I am talking about my preferences. I don´t like pictures from 200 or >400mm lenses for general purpose (not wild, sports or so). They seem to me >flat. >Just my preferences. >You can do what you want. > >Rafael > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> >To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 9:06 PM >Subject: RE: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens > > >>Are we disusing your back, or what makes more sense photographically? >>How did we get from the question of whether a 135 belongs on an M, to >>having to carry four cameras around?;-) >> >>B. D. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Rafael >>Alday >>Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 2:58 PM >>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >>Subject: Re: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens >> >> >>I completely disagree with those who think that 90 or 135mm are for SLR. >>I don't use lenses longer than 135. So, in an small bag, I carry 2 >>bodies (B&W and Color) and 21, 35, 50, 90 (and I hope a 135mm in the >>future). Yes, I could carry 4 bodies... 2 RF (B&W and color films) with >>21, 35 and 50 lenses and 2 SLR (B&W and color films) with 90,135,200 and >>400 lenses. Sorry but my back does not permit that, Rafael >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> >>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> >>Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 8:29 PM >>Subject: RE: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens >> >> >>>>when I shoot with a >>>>longer lens, I want the view through the lens. In fact, I prefer the >>>> >>>>reflex for pretty much anything over 50mm, and see the Leica 90s as >>>>fall backs for when I need near silence when shooting. >>>> >>>>But I am well aware that mine very much a minority opinion - on this >>>> >>>>list ;-) >>>> >>>Nope. I'm exactly the same way. I have a 90mm Summicron that stays >>>home _all_ the time. I walked by a shop and saw a nice Tele-Elmarit >>>and considered picking it up, but realized I use the nice Nikkor >>>85/2.0 when I need that kind of thing anyway ... so I bought the M2 >>>instead. I hate changing lenses so now with a M4 and M2 (the M3 is >>>just too much of a pain to use since it got "fixed", so it is retired) >>> >>>35 and 50, I'm happy ... with the F3 for 85/135/200 ... and for those >>>moments I need god's gift to photographers (AE) ... quite often, >>>actually. >>> >>>Daniel >>> >>>-- >>>To unsubscribe, see >>>http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >>> >>_______________________________________________________________ >>Copa del Mundo de la FIFA 2002 >>El único lugar de Internet con vídeos de los 64 partidos. >>¡Apúntante ya! en http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/fc/es/ >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> >>-- >>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > >_______________________________________________________________ >Yahoo! Messenger >Nueva versión: Webcam, voz, y mucho más ¡Gratis! >Descárgalo ya desde http://messenger.yahoo.es > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html