Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Seiko?
From: "Stuart Phillips" <stuart.phillips@rcn.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 21:08:57 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20021205203616.00b1a0c0@earthlink.net>

Doesn't he also have an M6?
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl Pultz" <cpultz@earthlink.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 8:48 PM
Subject: [Leica] Seiko?


> I found a 135 3.5 LSM lens at a local shop. Made by Seiko, the watch
> people? I think it was single coated, maybe not at all. $75. Add $50 for
an
> adaptor and I'm not sure it world be worth the money. Besides, my M2
> doesn't have a 135 frame.
>
> Been thinking that length would be nice to have, seeing the fabulous work
> GeeBee's is doing with one.
>
> Hey, wait a minute. Graham uses a M2. How does he do that??
>
> Carl
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Carl Pultz <cpultz@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Seiko?)