Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] was is this believable... now, (or soon to be) "My favorite Buick!" Can scotch be far away?
From: Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 14:47:01 -0500
References: <BA162F15.C6F%bcaldwell51@earthlink.net>

Austin:

That's right, I was certainly not read, (or even given) my Miranda
rights when arrested for a traffic accident involving my 2 ton truck and
a sheriff deputy's personal automobile in Tennessee several years ago. 

"Boy, you just bought yourself a Buick!"

At the time I didn't have a Leica with me to record the event.


- -- 
Jim - http://www.hemenway.com



Bryan Caldwell wrote:
> 
> On 12/6/02 10:03 AM, "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> 
> > You have to break a law to be under arrest, and being
> > under arrest requires telling you why you are under arrest, as well as the
> > reading of your Miranda Rights...I believe.
> 
> Hi Austin,
> 
> The above is not correct. Technically you only need be suspected of a crime
> to be arrested - whether or not you've committed a crime is a matter for a
> jury to decide, not a police officer. And, contrary to a great deal of
> popular opinion, there is no requirement that you be given your Miranda
> rights. The Miranda rights are required only if statements you make in
> response to law enforcement questioning are going to be used against you
> (and, even then, there are exceptions). You can be arrested without being
> Mirandized.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Bryan Caldwell <bcaldwell51@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Is this believable?)