Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Serial no. question
From: Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2002 14:51:21 -0500
References: <200212061805.KAA04636@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3DF0F044.40AA3418@ccs.carleton.ca>

Mark:

You don't think, (nah that's impossible) that it maybe, it kinda was
stolen?
- -- 
Jim - http://www.hemenway.com



Mark Langer wrote:
> 
> I was recently offered a 1a converted to a Standard.  The jpegs indicated that the serial no. in front of the accessory shoe had been sanded off.  I can't see anything else about the camera that would indicate that it isn't authentic.
> This isn't the first early rangefinderless Leica that I've seen with the serial no. effaced.  Is there some reason that this would have been done that is escaping me?
> 
> Curious in Ottawa,
> 
> Mark
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica] Serial no. question)
In reply to: Message from Mark Langer <mlanger@ccs.carleton.ca> ([Leica] Serial no. question)