Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital versus film
From: Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 17:05:29 -0800

Henning Wulff wrote:

> One of the reasons digital looks so 'sharp' is that it's MTF is very 
> good up to the resolution limit, so that things that need up to 
> 20lp/mm to image well are rendered extremely 'sharp' by cameras like 
> the 1Ds, while film has a gradual roll-off where some contrast is lost 
> already at lower frequencies, but on the other hand at very high 
> frequencies there is still information left.

It's the old story: analogue things fail "gracefully", while digital 
things fail abruptly (or, as some call it, "catastrophically").  It 
appears to be a robust pattern that is manifest is imaging, audio, 
control, even displays.  I believe "fuzzy" systems go someway towards 
addressing the issue, but I'm not a fuzzy systems expert, so I don't 
know the details off hand.

M.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html