Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I saw one account that wouldve meant using NEW TriX in my HC110B for only 3.5 minutes instead of the 7.5 - this is too much of a change for me. If I'm going to change anything then it will be my film. i like TriX but am not married to it. Appears that Illford will be the recipient of more purchases. i find HP5+ to be for me very ideal. ernie On Sunday, January 19, 2003, at 02:59 PM, Greg J. Lorenzo wrote: > Some people say that there been only minor changes to the emulsion, > requiring modified processing times. The new formulation is supposed > to be more scanner friendly. I suspect that Kodak has also reduced the > amount of silver in the film and I prefer to only print B&W in a wet > darkroom. Colour film I do scan. > > I've found some of the older stocks of Tri-X still available, but not > at Camera Stores. I've been buying the old Tri-X because the pull > dates are only one month sooner than the new Tri-X pull dates which > are in 2005. > > Regards, > > Greg > > Andrew Wells wrote: > >> What is the difference between the new and old Tri-X formulations >> people >> are talking about...? >> >> Andrew Wells >> San Francisco >> >> -- >> To unsubscribe, see >> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html >> > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > Half the people you know are below average - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html