Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/01/25

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls)
From: "Dimitri Visser" <dimitri@myjoy.nl>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2003 23:41:03 +0100
References: <20030122145753.GA6119@panix.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20030122104236.009f36a0@pop-server.twcny.rr.com> <20030122164458.GC6119@panix.com> <3E2F87DD.5010908@webshuttle.ch>

Hi,

> respect. I develop the Neopan in my Jobo processor, and the following
> two developers have worked well for me:
> - XTOL 1+3, 12,5 minutes at 20 C
> - Ilfotec DD-X 1+4, 5 minutes at 20 C

Can you tell me about the differences between these two developers in
combination with Neopan ? I'm always using Xtol, but was thinking about
DD-X. I don''t like mixing Xtol with water and on one occasion I had strange
results with Xtol. After making a new solution the problem disappaered. But
DD-X is pretty expensive if you use it a lot.

with kind regards,
Dimitri

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls))
In reply to: Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> ([Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] niagra falls)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> ([Leica] Re: Noepan 1600 (WAS: niagra falls))