Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Austin, I like it a bit myself. I usually don't use it, but when the choice is no camera at all, or a minimalist, the M3 and 50mm Elmar are the minimalist company ... you know, when you think ... "I'm not going to be taking any pictures, why bother" ... well, then the M3 and 50mm Elmar gets to come along. It can be pretty good (better than nothing, which was the alternative). http://www.geocities.com/daniel_ridings/paw/41.html I can kick myself. There was a new version available used for a decent price and I kept thinking ... I'll pick it up later. We know how that goes. So now I just never let myself fall into a "I'm not going to be taking any pictures" mood. That's why it doesn't get used as much now. Take care! Daniel PS: Fujicolor 800 is better than 1600. At 10:58 12.03.2003 -0500, you wrote: >Dumb in my case ;-) > >I just received a "new" 50/2.8 Elmar collapsible, and am so enamored by it, >I must go take a roll of pictures. A roll of film is the minimum unit of >measure I seen to have...and being a have a full brick (well, one roll was >"taken" by a friend of mine, so it's not really full) of Fuji Press 800, >I'll shoot it with that! > >Austin > > > > > > They've all gone deaf and blind. > > > > SonC > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Beddoe, Neil" <nbeddoe@lehman.com> > > To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> > > Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:25 AM > > Subject: [Leica] TEST - It's all gone Very quiet > > > > > > > TEST > > > > > > I haven't had anything from the LUG for a while. > > > > > > > > > Neil > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html