Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Thank you all for your opinions. I am going to have a closer look at the R2. But I haven't put the CL out of the game. Sometimes it's just about getting another camera to refill the inspiration. Maybe some of you know what I mean. Paul - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 7:55 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] CL > Paul > > A Leica CL is my camera of choice for traveling. I am > hardly ever without one. > > Gary is not facetious, just erroneous > > Jerry > > And as far as cost goes, a perfect CL with everything is > cheaper than a M3 body with nothing. > > Jerry > > Gary Williams wrote: > > > Subject: [Leica] CL > > > > > Hi! > > > > > > Just recently joined the list, I have followed the discussion about the > > M5. > > > Personally I use a M6, and very pleased with that, but thinking about > > > getting a second body, a not so expensive one to put in my bag when > > > travelling. The M5 is cheaper, but not lighter, so I am considering the > > > CL. I have a 35 and a 50 summicron. Is the CL a good choice? > > > > > > Paul > > > > At the risk of sounding facetious, I would suggest an M3. Use the M6 with > > your wide angles and the M3 with your 50mm and 90mm (and 135 if you have > > one). My 2 cents. > > > > Gary > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html