Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?
From: Tim Atherton <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 22:01:22 -0700

> > It sounds like they described it accurately to me. If the aperture
> > moves freely I would not worry about it. Oil on the aperture blades is
> > more of an issue with SLR auto diaphragm lenses.
>
> I believe it is a reflection issue...which wouldn't matter if
> it's an SLR or
> not...
>

As with LF lenses in shutters, as well as SLR auto diaphragm lenses, it's an
issue of the oil actually slowing the shutter/aperture diaphragm blades
down - they should be dry. But on a rangefinder it's not an issue as the
aperture blades don't move in a leica M lens during exposure.

I just cleaned off the blades of an old Rapax shutter by dropping some
naphthalene on em, but I wouldn't try that on your summilux.... if it's a
small amount, I don't think I'd worry - just mention it if you get it CLA'd
in the future.

Reflections? Bah humbug. Some of my shutter blades are so old and shiny you
could shave in em!

tim

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html