Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Under-EAR-underwear??
From: "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:51:53 -0600

Oh, that is bad, very bad. ;-)

K. 

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Don R.
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:30 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Under-EAR-underwear?? 


Hmm, I didn't start wearing women's silk panties until my wife found a pair
in the glove box in my car.


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Caliguri" <caliguri@rcn.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:06 PM
Subject: [Leica] Under-EAR-underwear??


> Yes-
>     you are right - it is from the Latin --- and I have worn ladies
> underwear under-ear before --- back in college, and my girlfriend from
> Wisconsin was usually wearing them at the same time .... But we won't GO
> THERE and I'll stop this right now -- PROMISE!! I'll watch my typos ....
> There are other sites for that (which I don't frequent!!!!)
>     Ed (blushing red)
> >
> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:18:56 -0600
> > From: "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com>
> > Subject: RE: RE: [Leica] UNDEARWAER!!
> > Message-ID: <MNELJONCHOKNFLMBFJCCCEOMCAAA.kitmc@acmefoto.com>
> > References:
> >
> > That's the Latin spelling. Underw-AE-r.
> >
> > K.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html