Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle
From: "Kit McChesney | acmefoto" <kitmc@acmefoto.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:20:46 -0600

Jerry--

Does this have anything to do with the old adage, "there is more than one
way to skin a cat?" ;-)

Aren't we all so silly today! Nothing like a little LeicaLevity!

Kit

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jerry
Lehrer
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 7:58 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle


Ed

I would say that the question of Schroedingers Cat applies
more to the problem at hand.  It is easily solve by applying
the principal of Occams Razor.

Jerry

Edward Caliguri wrote:

> The Uncertainty Principle refers to he fact both the position of an
electron
> and it's energy at that moment cannot be determined at the same exact
time;
> perturbation of the system in order to determine one of these as exact as
> possible changes the other.
>     I guess I don't understand the relation to photography in general ..
>     Ed
>
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Leica Users digest)
> > Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:50:08 -0700 (PDT)
> > To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: Leica Users digest V24 #240
> >
> > Does the uncertainty principle of Heissenberg not aply to an m?
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle)