Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:58:46 -0700
References: <1467872.1050602513136.JavaMail.nobody@daisy.psp.pas.earthlink.net>

Doug

Please understand this.  What we are observing are your photos,
not the subject directly.

NOW, tell me how the Principle applies?  Essay limited to 1000
words with a 2 hour time limit :-)   Austin Franklin need not apply.

Jerry



Douglas Herr wrote:

> Kit McChesney | acmefoto <kitmc@acmefoto.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes, I see what you mean about the work you do with the
> > critters (always gorgeous, by the way), and that's just a very
> > vivid, real-life example of how we do influence the "picture,"
> > or the big picture, so to speak. I still think the quantum
> > physics example still applies.
>
> It even applies in landscape photos but we don't notice it 'cuz we (the observers/measurement tools) are of a much smaller scale that the stuff we're observing.  In the landscape example the probablilty is very high that the things we're observing are what would have been if we had not been there :-)
>
> Doug Herr
> Birdman of Sacramento
> http://www.wildlightphoto.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] fractal question)
In reply to: Message from Douglas Herr <telyt@earthlink.net> (Re: RE: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle)