Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That was, indeed, the sloppily worded question. I will attempt greater precision in the future. ;-) B. D. - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of (SonC) Sonny Carter Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 6:36 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Wide zooms hmmm, yes, but also on other movie cameras the question was "show me an f 1.4 zoom. ;-)" Steve and Johnny did. And for the record, Angenieux had a f.95 Cine lens a long time ago. So, Noctilux is not the fastest production lens made. SonC - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Lehrer" <jerryleh@pacbell.net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [Leica] RE: Wide zooms > Steve > > But aren't those cine lenses as used on the Bolex movie cameras? > > Jerry > > Steve LeHuray wrote: > > > BD Colen wrote: > > > > > Not just contemporary primes - primes have always outclassed > > > zooms. ALTHOUGH - the better zooms today would really eliminate > > > the necessity of using primes, were it not for the additional > > > advantage primes can offer in terms of lens speed - show me an f > > > 1.4 zoom. ;-) > > > > > > > ...sure, I have a Angenieux 16-44mm/f1.2 and a Angenieux > > 9.5-57mm/1.9 and a > > Angenieux 12-120/f2.2 > > > > sl > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html