Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/30
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Under picture adjust, I set the contrast to low, and the sharpness to low, and keep the saturation at standard. Sonny - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc Attinasi" <marc@attinasi.org> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:16 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Digilux 1 questions > > On Friday, May 30, 2003, at 06:38 AM, SonC ((Sonny Carter)) wrote: > > > One more note about Landscapes, Since I do the majority of my output > > on the web, the LC5/Digilux is an ideal camera for the task. If I > > were sharing my work in a bricks and mortor gallery, I might have a > > quite different take on it. > > > > Interesting - when I shoot landscapes, particularly with the local Oak > trees in the shot, the images from the digilux end up looking, well, > digital. The detail in the grasses and leaves is coarse and blocky. For > smooth textures - faces, rocks, etc. - the images are fantastic. I have > real problems with micro detail in the Digilux - most all digital > cameras to be honest. In print or on the web I notice this and I don't > like it. > > That said, I agree the Digilux does allow pictures that could not > otherwise be taken. I spend a lot less of my shooting time on my > stomach with teh Digilux, for example, and get a lot more > snail-eye-view shots. Gotta love those big LCD displays! > > Cheers! > - marc > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html