Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/14
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I'm not Austin, but I think that it is because they feel that they can do it well. At 05:51 PM 6/14/2003 -0600, you wrote: > > > > > Certainly looks like they were into bondage by the looks of > > > the site... > > > > > > > > No, Tim, it looks like they took pictures of that as the > > subject matter, > > > > that in NO WAY means THEY "were into" it. > > > > > > > > Austin > > > > > > Oh - sorry, I get it - it's a documentary exploration of soft porn...? > > > > Are you just that clueless, Tim, that you simply don't understand that, or > > are you just being a fool? > > > >Austin, > >If someone (male) takes soft-porn photographs of someone ((female) else (not >glamour, not really erotica), what are the reasons they are doing it? Money? >(to sell), personal pleasure? What else? Can you argue that it's done out of >admiration for the beauty of the "classical" female form? > >Give me the honest reason such photographs are taken. > >tim > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html