Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl
From: Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 23:41:17 -0400
References: <BB408243.2A75E%mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> <3F1B565D.8020905@ldp.com> <3F1B5AA5.D772DAA2@sympatico.ca>

frank theriault wrote:
> I read an interview of Nick Ut, and I recall that he said that he used a Nikon.
> 
> regards,
> frank

I'm sure he had a Nikon, but the perspective of that picture is (at 
least to my eye) consistent with the use of a 35mm lens. Lots of guys 
used a Leica for the 35mm and 50mm and a Nikon for the 105mm and 200mm.

Rolfe

- -- 
Rolfe Tessem      |     Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
rolfe@ldp.com     |     96 Morton Street
(212) 463-0029    |     New York, Ny 10014

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
In reply to: Message from Mike Quinn <mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)