Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?
From: Allen Graves <ahgraves@prodigy.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 22:25:23 -0500
References: <8384019C-BCB9-11D7-8E7E-00039354861E@attinasi.org>

I agree with you totally- by marketing ploy, I just meant the 
language in the brochures that lead people to believe that the top 
plates were truly titanium-harder, lighter, more rigid and more 
durable- not just a normal top plate with an exceptionally durable 
and attractive finish.

Allen



>It's not a marketing ploy, it's a great finish. A Titanium top plate 
>would be less appealing, really. I had one on my Olympus and it is 
>ugly. Apparently getting paint to stick to titanium is difficult or 
>impossible, and the raw titanium is not that pretty.
>
>I wonder if Luxus owners believe that their cameras are solid gold? ;-)
>
>Personally, I'm saving for a titanium M6, I think they look swell, 
>and they probably work really well too.
>
>- marc
>
>On Tuesday, July 22, 2003, at 07:40 PM, Allen Graves wrote:
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)
Reply from "Jack Herron" <jherron@theriver.com> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)
In reply to: Message from Marc Attinasi <marc@attinasi.org> (Re: [Leica] M6 Titanium or Titanized?)