Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Photo Finished
From: "Phil Leeson" <pjleeson@mchsi.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 22:18:59 -0500
References: <0B53EA2A-C2D2-11D7-8920-003065C992F8@twcny.rr.com> <000401c356f5$b83197e0$fbfea8c0@DHHZSZ11> <3F286DF4.A6498773@sympatico.ca>

More bad news for us film luddites:
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2003-07-27-digital_x.htm

Mighty close to $10.

Phil

> However, here's my take on why film will be around and plentiful for a
long
> time:
>
> Disposable Cameras.
>
> I bet that a huge percentage of film sold these days is in these
babies.  Ever
> go to a tourist area and see how many of these are around?  Weddings?
Company
> parties and functions?  Seems to be a big trend these days to throw a
disposable
> or two at each table, and invite the guests to take pics of the party,
and throw
> the cams in a bag on the way out, so the hosts can get them developed.
>
> Until they figure out a way to make a $10 digital camera, the ~very~
casual
> photographer will buy three disposables a year - holidays, birthdays,
and
> Christmas/Hannukah/whatever-your-tradition-calls-mid-winter-festival.
As long
> as they sell, Kodak will make film for them.  As long as they do that,
they'll
> sell film in boxes.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Red Dawn" <reddawn@singnet.com.sg> (Re: [Leica] Photo Finished)
In reply to: Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> ([Leica] Photo Finished)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] Photo Finished)
Message from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Photo Finished)