Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Leica Second Body
From: "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 13:41:23 -0400
References: <861E7358-C9EC-11D7-8195-000393802534@mac.com> <008001c35e07$17a6df60$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <003201c35e28$cec44d60$fbfea8c0@DHHZSZ11> <004201c35e7d$51159e00$87d86c18@gv.shawcable.net> <003201c35e99$12f41860$fbfea8c0@DHHZSZ11>

I am new to Leica this year---after 25 years with Contax---and use an M7 as
my main RF body.  I am delighted with the M7.  I'm struggling on a second
body, however.  I have tried M2, M3, M5 and CL, and have sold or am in the
process of selling all of them.  The M3 is terrific, except I find I can't
live without the 35mm frame lines.  The M5 is just too big.  The CL is too
difficult to focus with a lens longer than 50mm, doesn't seem that well
made, why not use a friggin' P&S instead.  But I want an interchangeable
lens body.  I see no advantage in an M4 over an M2.  I don't need the M4 28
or 135mm frame lines, in fact I like the uncluttered M2 finder.  An M4 is
more expensive anyway.  An M6 is very pricey for a second body for me.

The M2 is leading the pack so far, but I wonder about the one I haven't
tried---the CLE.  (Hexar RF is out, too many issues with M compatibly and
now Konica USA is pulling the plug on it.  The Voigtlander Bessa shutter is
too noisy).  I would prefer a smaller body, and in black---but can't afford
a black M2.  I feel too conspicuous with a chrome body.  My bad?  Anyway,
the specs on the CLE are intriguing, however, potential repairs, even a CLA
for a CLE (say it 10 times) is a concern.  On his website, Stephen Gandy is
practically begging for CLE spare parts.  Thoughts?

Gary

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Leica Second Body)
Reply from Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Leica Second Body)
In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time)